Wow, there are quite a few angsty people on dA. Recently, I was cruising through the recently submitted poetry, when I stumbled upon a short piece written in couplet form (AABBCCDD...). There were a few minor errors, and I offered some suggestions. My comment went something like this:
"Honestly, this poem is weak. The continuous couplet form is meant for a more playful subject, not such a serious topic such as this. Also, the weak rhyme scheme is hurting it. Dull rhymes such as kiss/this are overused and boring."
After that, I went on to detail a few things I liked about the poem, and left it at that. The author took it rather well, but then someone else came on and proceeded to flame me profanely, telling me I had no idea what I was talking about, and later telling me that I have no poetic talent, and therefore have no room to criticize.
In the end, I was told to sugarcoat my critiques, so people feel better. So, for anyone who reads this, I'm interested to know what you think on this matter. Should critiques be sugarcoated, and thereby make the people feel better, or should they be given straight up, with the honest intention of edifying another?
Anyone interested in reading the poem, and the comment progression can find it here:
www.deviantart.com/deviation/2…